Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
In this study, assuming a normal distribution of procedure, about one-quarter of patients may be in the period before optimal improvement.
English and Dutch hospitals in the sample presented a balanced distribution of procedure risk between weekdays and weekends.
The 11 hospitals in England and the 6 Dutch hospitals present a balanced distribution of procedure risk between weekdays and weekends: for the 11 hospitals in England, 39% of weekend procedures are high risk compared with 38% on weekdays; for the six Dutch hospitals, these figures are 33% and 34%, respectively (see online supplementary figure A1 in appendix).
Similar(57)
The distribution of procedure-specific risk throughout the week was varied; notably, the six Australian hospitals seemed to perform a larger proportion of riskier procedures on weekends (33% of total procedures on weekends) compared with the rest of the week (22% of total procedures on weekdays).
4 The distribution of procedure-specific risk throughout the week varies for the sampled hospitals within each country; notably, the six Australian hospitals seem to perform a larger proportion of riskier procedures on weekends (33% of total procedures on weekends) compared with the rest of the week (22% of total procedures on weekdays).
The distribution of procedures is listed in Table 4.
The distribution of procedures is shown in Table 4.
Table 2 shown the distribution of procedures used for the umbilical cord care.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of procedures from the top node concept "procedure" in SNOMED CT, and the most common procedure "Procedure by method" (n = 305).
The distribution of procedures changed between 2007 and 2009 (chi-square = 5.45, 1 degree of freedom, p = 0.02), with an increase in the proportion of PRK.
The chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of procedures (PRK or LASIK) in 2007 with that in 2009.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com