Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Distribution of errors based on five repeated barcode-position measurements, n = 163,810 repeated barcodes (left).
Laplace proved that the distribution of errors in large data samples from astronomical observations can be approximated by a Gaussian or normal distribution.
In this paper we address the assumptions about the distribution of errors made by voxel-based morphometry.
The non-linear relationship between response (body score) and explanatory variables (day and food treatment) warranted the application of a generalized additive model (GAM) considering Cox Proportional hazards distribution of errors.
Distribution of errors from measurement of a single barcode's position when the original and repeated measurements were separated by the entire experiment lasting 96 h n = 40,032 repeated barcodes (right).
Distribution of errors from measurement of a single barcode's position where the original and repeated measurements are separated by less than one hour (h), n = 31,506 repeated barcodes (centre).
The distribution of errors conditioned on the sample composition and city showed that estimates were accurate (average mean bias = 0.006%, maximum mean bias = 0.3%).
(A) Distribution of errors and predictions for the training pool.
(C) Distribution of errors and predictions for the validation set.
Although we have no knowledge about the distribution of errors, we assumed a normal distribution of errors to employ a probit regression.
Normal distribution of errors and variance homogeneity were checked via visual inspection and Levene's test.
More suggestions(15)
distribution of causes
distribution of miscarriages
distribution of discrepancies
distribution of aberrations
distribution of tolerances
distribution of deviations
share of errors
spread of errors
distribution of problems
proportion of errors
distribution of error
distribution of incorrect
division of errors
distribution of degree
sharing of errors
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com