Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Heteroepitaxial growth of quantum dots yields a sparse packing density and achieves only partial ordering with a broad distribution of dot sizes on some particular materials [9].
Similar(59)
The authors explain the influence of dot size on the FSS with a size-dependent dot shape.
As the current of QDs decreases with the dot size decreasing, the increase of the current with dot density will be hindered by the decrease of dot size.
Self-assembled Ge nano-dots were produced by excimer laser annealing, and the statistical distribution of dot density and size was collected for different laser energy.
In order to investigate the relationship between dot formation and laser energy, the statistical distribution of dot density and size was prepared by observing top-view SEM (scanning electron microscope), as shown in Figure 5.
Thus, at very low excitation power and low temperature, we deduce that the asymmetric shape is due to luminescence originating from a bimodal size distribution of dots [16].
The Arrhenius plot calculated in terms of the probability for electron emission from the s- and p-energy distributions determined by dot size distributions is shown in (b).
The threshold was adjusted depending on the overall distribution of dots on the typing profile.
However, the anisotropic effect is much more reduced with respect to the results obtained for sample A. The effects of different dot size distributions and inter-dot coupling have been analyzed by low-temperature linear polarized PL measurements carried out on the samples A and B buried with GaAs.
The total distribution of clonal sizes is represented as a dot-plot graph with the mean clonal size ±SEM.
The samples with InAs coverage of 1.80 and 1.85 MLs show nearly unimodal size distribution of the dots having a dot diameter and average height of about 30 nm ± 5% and 3.0 nm ± 5%, 30 nm ± 5% and 3.9 nm ± 5%, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com