Sentence examples for distribution of discrepancies from inspiring English sources

Open image in new window Fig. 3 Distribution of discrepancies with Özden et al.

To elaborate further in these differences, Fig. 3 presents histograms of the distribution of discrepancies for those observations with bilateral information available in both datasets.

With this approach, the analysis of containerized flows establishes the existence, extent, location, and spatial distribution of discrepancies in South American landside trade impedance.

Figure 2 shows the cumulative distribution of discrepancies across all SNPs.

In this paper we have simulated some common treatment trial scenarios and compared the results in terms of the distribution of discrepancies between treatment groups.

The distribution of discrepancies was skewed to the left, i.e., estimates based on LMP were more likely to be higher than those based on an early second-trimester ultrasound (data not shown).

The diagram shows latitudinal distribution of discrepancy in IRI model IRI-20011 as topside) TEC (DTEC) as compared to ground-based GPS-TEC for all season during 2009 to 2013.

The diagram shows latitudinal distribution of discrepancy in IRI model (IRI-NeQ as topside) TEC (DTEC) as compared to ground-based GPS-TEC for all season during 2009 to 2013. Figure 5 Contour diagram with IRI01-corr as topside.

The diagram shows latitudinal distribution of discrepancy in IRI model (IRI01-corr as topside) TEC (DTEC) as compared to ground-based GPS-TEC for all season during 2009 to 2013. Figure 6 shows the seasonal variation of hourly mean GPS-TEC and IRI-2012 model TEC at Patumwan, Thailand during the period 2009 to 2013.

Fisherian p-values are simply calculated as the quantile of the discrepancy function calculated on the observed data in the probability distribution of discrepancy functions of data and parameters randomly generated according to some given probabilistic scheme associated to the fitted statistical model.

The discrepancies could be identified among 35 sections, representing 19 departments, and the distribution of these discrepancies is shown in Table  3:> -wrap-foot> Discrepancy 1: In the PAVI-survey 15 departments stated that they did not have a palliative guideline/instruction, while in the self-evaluation they claimed to have fulfilled Standard 2.19.1 fully or partially.