Suggestions(2)
Exact(11)
However, when considering the distress criterion, on average, a decrease of 38.51% was found in the prevalence rates of FGID.
The inclusion of a distress criterion in the ongoing development of diagnostic criteria for FGID is therefore warranted.
When the distress criterion was taken into account, the prevalence rates changed as follows: 717 participants (38.61%) fulfilled the Rome criteria for at least one diagnosis.
The separation distress criterion was significantly more often met by widows compared to orphans, χ 1, N = 400) = 4.49, p <.05, 43.3%, n = 84, 33%, n = 68, respectively.
This study aimed to assess the impact of including a subjective distress criterion in the diagnosis of FGID on the prevalence rates of FGID.
When a subjective distress criterion was considered, the prevalence rates of FGID deviated considerably from the original prevalence rates, with 38.6% of the sample fulfilling the criteria for at least one diagnosis.
Similar(49)
More specifically, respiratory distress criteria were defined as stated in Table 1.
Stop (Criteria for terminating walk): Distress: various distress criteria, O2 < 80%: O2 saturation dropping below 80%, None: Everyone completed test.
One child was positive on ICD-10 and negative on DSM-IV-TR because of the lack of clinically significant impairment or distress (DSM criterion E).
Four children were positive on ICD-10 and negative on DSM-IV-TR because they did not show clinically significant impairment or distress (DSM criterion D). 24 children received a positive diagnosis with the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis while the ICD-10 diagnosis was negative.
Chronic respiratory disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome criteria were independent predictors of polymicrobial aetiology.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com