Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Currently, three types of IFNs are distinguished – type I, type II consisting of only IFN-γ, and the recently discovered type III also called IFN-λ.
For erroneous decisions we distinguished type I and type II errors: In type I errors, the editors concluded that a manuscript had the scientific potential for publication and accepted it, when it in fact did not, as reflected in a manuscript's low scientific impact subsequent to publication.
Two types of error are distinguished: type I error, i.e. rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true, and type II error, i.e. not rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact the alternative hypothesis is true.
Two types of CRPS can be distinguished: type 1, formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy or algodystrophy, which occurs without a definable nerve lesion and type 2, formerly called causalgia, in which a definable nerve lesion is present [ 2].
Most studies with post-2000 data on relative risk have not distinguished type 1 from type 2 diabetes (17– 20), or have been restricted to newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (21, 22).
In principle, two major fiber types of skeletal muscle can be distinguished: type II fibers, also called glycolytic fibers, which have few mitochondria and largely generate ATP through glycolytic metabolism, and type I fibers, also called oxidative fibers, which are mitochondria-rich and utilize mainly oxidative phosphorylation for energy production [ 8, 9].
Similar(49)
Distinguishing type 2 from types 1 and 3 Gaucher disease has remained challenging, due to the lack of a clear correlation between phenotype and enzymatic activity or genotype.
This enzyme can distinguish type 2c from other CPVs (4 ).
However, these methods could not distinguish type 2c from type 2b (4 ).
Data limitations precluded us from conclusively distinguishing type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
4 The questionnaire did not distinguish type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com