Sentence examples for distinguished scientific from inspiring English sources
In Political Theory (1959) he distinguished scientific from nonscientific theory.
There is a parliament, there is the world's greatest arts festival, there are ambitious banks (one of them perhaps, in the past, rather too ambitious), there is internationally distinguished scientific and cultural activity.
In the first part of the paper we discuss the pattern of research in microelectronics, illustrating the reasons why, in order to achieve distinguished scientific performance, universities need to collaborate with industry, and in particular academic researchers need to interact with industrial ones by face-to-face knowledge exchanges.
The research articles based on Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database have been accepted in distinguished scientific journals worldwide [ 11– 15].
Roughly, three different types of evidence can be distinguished: scientific data, observations of health professionals, and personal experiences of lay people.
In 1982, he won the American Psychological Association's Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award.
The Science Checklist was developed to help students distinguish scientific investigations from other human endeavors.
He distinguishes scientific argument from moral and religious mystical intuition, although he does allow for the notion of a revealed intuition in science.
Scientific endeavors have a set of key characteristics (summarized in Fig. 1), involving both the topic being studied and the way it is studied, which can help distinguish scientific investigations from other sorts of human endeavors: Fig. 1 Science cannot be absolutely defined; however, scientific endeavors have a set of key characteristics, summarized in the Science Checklist.
Popper (1965, 1968) championed falsifiability as a criterion of demarcation that is more appropriate than verifiability as a criterion of meaningfulness, on the ground that what we need is a basis for distinguishing scientific from nonscientific statements, where the latter can still be meaningful, even when they are not scientific.
In chapter II of The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), Popper had distinguished between scientific practice and scientific standards, principles, or methodology.
