'distinguished results' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in any context where you want to express that something has achieved notable and impressive outcomes. For example: "The team achieved distinguished results in the competition, beating out several well-established competitors."
Following the Vienna debacle, he achieved equally distinguished results with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, where he was first consultant and then chief conductor from 1988 to 1996, and he quickly settled in to his stride as the music director of the New York Philharmonic from 2002, featuring John Adams's memorial to the victims of 9/11, On the Transmigration of Souls, in his first season.
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) achieved best distinguished results; the testing rate of predication set was 95%.
Only four studies [ 13, 16, 20, 25] distinguished results between the two groups (NOM vs. OM).
Only at higher levels (third and fourth Eigenvectors) green and yellow could be more clearly distinguished (results not shown).
* Sheep and goats not being distinguished Results of 2-tailed chi-squared tests of the hypothesis that species, age group and sex differed between positive and negative animals.
The problem is considered important even for approximation on restricted classes, with several distinguished results in this direction.
In some cases the sources of the photons can be distinguished resulting in "which-path" distinguishability D. The complementarity principle in quantum optics answers the question: How coherent are the more or less distinguishable shares of the electric field (or how distinguishable are the paths of the more or less coherent light modes)?
If we attend to the details of the nerve ganglia of the rat's spinal cord, different outcomes can be distinguished, resulting from different amounts of maternal licking and it becomes an open process.
Fifty-six STs and 48 AFLP types (80% cut-off) were distinguished, resulting in a similar discriminatory power (Simpson's index 91.7 vs. 91.4, respectively; 95% confidence interval 88.9 – 94.4 and 88.8 – 94.0, respectively) using this AFLP cut-off.
Using this cut-off, 88 AFLP types were distinguished, resulting in a Simpson's index of 98.5%, and the central STs of the three European clones I, II and III were subdivided into three, 15 and 13 AFLP types, respectively (Table 3).
This model uses a hierarchy in which different levels of disease-related disruptive impairment are distinguished, resulting in seven domains (see left column in Table 1).
