Sentence examples for distinguished arguments from inspiring English sources

Two sets of arguments can be distinguished: Arguments favoring federal orders compared with secession and completely independent sovereign states; and arguments supporting federal arrangements rather than a (further) centralized unitary state.

In Ford (2004) this is used to distinguish argument strengths (see above).

These conditions, once identified, would distinguish good arguments from bad arguments.

The Latin phrases a priori ("from what is before") and a posteriori ("from what is after") were used in philosophy originally to distinguish between arguments from causes and arguments from effects.

So the first step in sound argumentation about property is distinguishing those arguments which support the existence of property in general from arguments which support the existence of a system of a specific kind (Waldron 1988).

When distinguished, the argument against abortion is negatively affected.

We may first distinguish between arguments designed to show that their conclusions are true, reasonable, or justified, on the one hand, and arguments designed to show that their conclusions are more reasonable or more justified than they were apart from the considerations adduced.

We may distinguish general arguments, designed to show that all miracle claims are subject in principle to certain failings, from particular arguments, designed to show that, whatever may be the case in principle, such miracle claims as have historically been offered are inadequately supported.

But we need to distinguish two arguments that Mr Keim conflates.

To see the plausibility of this answer, consider how one might distinguish good arguments by example from bad ones.

The key to this is showing them how to distinguish scholarly arguments from opinion.