Sentence examples for distinction which may from inspiring English sources
The report's authors say: "The use of rockets in the possession of Palestinian armed groups, indiscriminate in nature, and any targeted mortar attack against civilians constitute violations of international humanitarian law, in particular of the fundamental principle of distinction, which may amount to a war crime".
Not all countries have this distinction, which may make comparison across studies difficult.
Even if, at first sight, there seems to be a discrepancy between this report and our results, there is a subtle experimental distinction which may explain this difference.
A crude distinction, which may have caused some misclassification, was made between the two by assuming that only hysterectomies with ovariectomies were followed by estrogen treatment.
It is worth noting that the MTA membership logo is extremely similar to the certification logo (the caduceus) with the exception of the word "member" instead of "certification," a distinction which may not be apparent or have meaning to website visitors.
However, differing models of intentional and causal, including recursive, structure may lie behind some medievals' use of such distinctions, which may suggest different models of neural processing with testable predictions.
Most of these interpretations are however heavily debated, as they were either based on inter-categorical comparisons [36] [39] which suffer from serious low-level confounds [40], or on old-novel distinctions which may signal general repetition effects rather than face-recognition per se [41] [44].
Our measure of physical inactivity did not differentiate between physical activity at work, commuting or during leisure time, distinctions which may demonstrate diverging patterns according to socioeconomic position.
Understanding the genetic architecture underlying traits important to reproductive isolation and hybrid fitness allows us to develop hypotheses regarding which genetic regions are important for maintaining species distinctions and which may provide a selective advantage when allowed to introgress through hybridization in nature.
This finding unto itself is not surprising given previous reports of nasal carriage and clinical isolates sharing common lineages [9], [15], [27] and that the nature of MLST limits the distinction between strains, which may in turn over represent the relatedness of nasal carriage and clinical isolates.
If that is right, then she has failed to appreciate the distinction between counterfactual conditionals (which may be true in spite of having no instances) and mere indicative conditionals (which may be true because they have no instances).
