Sentence examples for distinction is consistent with from inspiring English sources

That distinction is consistent with other Code provisions that depend on whether the buyer has accepted the goods.

This temporal distinction is consistent with the differentiation between proactive and reactive control mechanisms in the DMC model.

This distinction is consistent with important differences between the machineries involved in their biogenesis (Pelicic 2008).

This distinction is consistent with the well-known concept of "preferences," which "need no inferences" (Zajonc, 1980).

This distinction is consistent with our data, but our paradigm was not designed to test this latter hypothesis further.

This structural distinction is consistent with the differing appearances of the mutant versus WT retinas seen in H&E-stained sections (Fig. 1A).

This finding suggests that working memory for verbal information is less dependent on the right posterior cortex than working memory required for visual information, a distinction that is consistent with the idea that visual processing occurs in the right hemisphere.

The latency and duration of the significant within-category distinctions (150 250 ms) is consistent with research showing increased activity in the ventral stream from 170 to 258 ms for object-specific semantic information compared with general category information (Clarke et al. 2011), and that after ∼200 ms neural activity begins to correlate with naming latencies (Costa et al. 2009).

The most sensible results were obtained from the spectral subset containing bands 2, 4, 5, 11, and 12, which clearly delineated the exotic timber plantations of the region and provided some additional distinction between native vegetation that is consistent with information pertaining to the forest ecology of the Catlins.

This distinction between the two instruments is consistent with previous research indicating that condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures tend to be more responsive to change than generic measures [ 36- 38].

To the extent that the majority ultimately cites the Kotteakos standard as governing this case, ante, at 449, it is consistent with this distinction in our case law; to the extent that the majority suggests that Chapman controls the outcome of this case, however, ante, at 449, it reveals confusion about this distinction.