Sentence examples for distinction depending on from inspiring English sources

Year by year, houses are admitted or excluded from this distinction, depending on various considerations.

Its service offered vast opportunities for social distinction, depending on the vessels it was brewed in, the time it was taken, the comestibles with which it was consumed, who poured, whether milk was added before or after the pouring, the sorts of cups in which it was served, whether it was sweetened, and so on.

We performed a real-time evaluation of the automatic differential count according to WBC number with Sysmex XN series and demonstrated a significant differential impact on blast distinction depending on the number of WBC.

In order to account for these differences and make a distinction depending on where the cooccurrence is detected in the text, the system separates each abstract into 3 parts: title, abstract body, and conclusions.

The distinction depended on the purpose of the regulation, he said.

But, often enough, that distinction depends on the referee: Dave Chappelle's motive for abandoning his own Comedy Central show, after all, was in large part his discomfort with what, exactly, his white fans were laughing at.

Yet despite Ms. Fenstermann's expert pointers over our two-day exploration of the Decorah area's historic barns, I never managed to distinguish between a bridge and a bank barn (the distinction depends on how a farmer handled hay bales, she explained) or discuss the fine points of a gable versus a gambrel roof.

Instead, the distinction depends on the fact that the intellect uses different concepts to indicate the being of a thing, on the one hand, and that which a thing is, on the other.

What Parfit suggests is that, if the objection depends on a hard-and-fast metaphysical distinction between persons (i.e., on the non-identity of different persons), and if this distinction depends on the further fact of identity — a nonexistent fact if reductionism is true — then the distinction is nothing to take seriously in the first place.

While there are difficulties in even arriving at a clear formulation of this distinction (particularly so far as the nature of the relation between the two components is concerned), such a distinction depends on being able to distinguish, at some basic level, between a 'subjective' contribution to knowledge that comes from ourselves and an 'objective' contribution that comes from the world.

Clearly, this distinction depends on how "relevant" is defined.