Sentence examples for dissimilar conclusions from inspiring English sources

Watching "Heaven's Gate" for the first time in February I understood how it could mean so many seemingly contradictory things to so many people and why so many dissimilar conclusions could all feel true.

These models led to dissimilar conclusions, despite the absence of evidence of lack of fit.

Others might reach somewhat dissimilar conclusions or interpretations of our data.

Even if the interpretation of the excess hazard model is different from the relative hazard model, and if these models may lead to apparent dissimilar conclusions, we underlined their complementary interest in looking for factors associated with mortality related to ESRD.

Comparative analysis was done between three groups of respondents with different category leading to confirmation of argument through divergence with dissimilar conclusions in some areas, while the severity of perception and need was placed differently, but the intention was similar in other areas (Table  3).

See also an earlier meta-analysis by Doucouliagos and Stanley (2009) that suggests, after having taken publication bias into account, a not dissimilar conclusion in arriving at a minimum-wage elasticity of−0.01.

Decades later, people with advanced academic degrees came to a not-dissimilar conclusion about the intersection of human psychology, money, and "positional concerns," by way of a study finding that a surprising number of people would choose to earn $50,000 in a situation in which their peers made $25,000, rather than a $100,000 in a context where $200,000 was typical.

The differences come from: the variant target study population, the more comprehensive included studies, the distinct comparison, the dissimilar results and conclusion.

In other words, much of the evidence needed to establish unambiguous responsibility for starting the war was being manipulated before, during and after it.That said, the two books are very different and reach dissimilar, though equally nuanced, conclusions.

The two methods make dissimilar assumptions, but the broad conclusions concerning the consequences of spatial correlation in the landscape structure are the same.

What's dissimilar is the end point.