dissected out

USAGE SUMMARY

The term "dissected out" is not grammatically correct.
It would make more sense to say "dissected" or "extracted". You can use this term to describe something that has been removed from a larger whole, as in "The team dissected out the key components of the experiment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

After 7 days, TGs were dissected out and immunostained with an anti-TRPV1 antibody.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Neural tubes were dissected out as described earlier33.

Nature

At the end of the experiment, the tissues were dissected out for histopathological evaluation.

Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

Striatum were dissected out and stored at −80°C until analysis.

Nature

Fetal organs were dissected out, washed three times and mechanically dissociated to small pieces.

Nature

After perfusion, the cortex was dissected out and post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde overnight.

Protein & Cell

iWAT was dissected out, and fixed in PBS/1% PFA/10% sucrose at 4 °C overnight.

Protein & Cell

The brains were dissected out and post-fixed in the same fixative for 12 h.

International Aquatic Research

The whole brain was dissected out, pooled, homogenized, and dried for 24 h at 105 °C.

The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology

Brains were dissected out after the fourth donepezil dose, and spine analysis was completed in dentate gyrus granule neurons.

Duke University

Spleens were dissected out and weighed.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "dissected out" is common, consider using the more grammatically sound and concise term "dissected" for clarity and precision in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "dissected out" when "dissected" is sufficient. The addition of "out" often adds unnecessary length without changing the meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dissected out" functions as a phrasal verb, indicating the action of carefully separating and removing a part from a larger entity. Although Ludwig AI suggests it is grammatically incorrect, its prevalence in scientific literature makes it understandable, if not ideal.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "dissected out" is frequently used, particularly in scientific contexts, it is considered grammatically questionable by Ludwig AI. It functions as a phrasal verb describing the careful removal of a part from a larger entity. The primary communicative purpose is to detail experimental procedures. Despite its common usage, especially across scientific sources, consider using the simpler and more grammatically sound term "dissected" for better clarity and precision. Alternatives like "excised" or "extracted" may also be appropriate depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

dissected

Shorter, more direct term; omits the "out".

excised

Focuses on surgically removing something, often with precision.

extracted

Implies careful removal, often to isolate a specific component.

separated

Emphasizes the act of dividing or detaching one part from another.

removed

A general term for taking something away or off.

isolated

Highlights the action of setting something apart from its surroundings.

cut out

Describes physically separating something by cutting.

separated out

Emphasizes segregating something from a group.

taken out

A more informal way of saying something was removed.

sectioned

Refers to dividing something into sections or parts.

FAQs

Is "dissected out" grammatically correct?

Ludwig AI indicates that "dissected out" is not grammatically correct, suggesting "dissected" or "extracted" as better alternatives. However, it is frequently used, especially in scientific literature.

What does "dissected out" mean?

The phrase "dissected out" means to carefully remove or separate something, typically a part of an organism, through dissection. Consider using the simpler term "dissected".

When should I use "dissected out" instead of "dissected"?

While some sources use "dissected out", it's generally preferable to use "dissected" for conciseness and grammatical correctness. The addition of "out" doesn't significantly alter the meaning.

What are some alternatives to "dissected out"?

Depending on the context, you can use "excised", "extracted", or "removed" instead of "dissected out".