disrupt his workflow

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "disrupt his workflow" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to interruptions or disturbances in someone's work process or routine. Example: "The unexpected meeting was scheduled at a time that would disrupt his workflow significantly."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

In fact, little seems to disrupt his equilibrium.

The New York Times - Science

His late arrival did not disrupt his routine.

The New York Times - Sports

Small groups of protesters have tried to disrupt his visit.

BBC

Disrupting his pregame routine comes with risks.

The New York Times - Sports

Protesters disrupted his public appearances.

The New York Times

It disrupted his shooting rhythm.

The New York Times - Sports

But impending civil war continued disrupting his education.

Harvard University

But she really is disrupting his work.

Harvard Business Review

Mr. Daly even had hecklers disrupting his tapings.

The New York Times

But have marriage plans disrupted his golf?

The New York Times - Sports

This disrupted his preparations for the rest of the season.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "disrupt his workflow", ensure that the context clearly indicates whose workflow is being affected and what is causing the disruption.

Common error

Avoid using "disrupt his workflow" without clearly specifying who "his" refers to. This can lead to confusion and ambiguity in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "disrupt his workflow" functions as a verb phrase where "disrupt" is the verb, "his" is a possessive pronoun, and "workflow" is a noun. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "disrupt his workflow" is a grammatically correct expression used to describe the interruption or disturbance of someone's work process. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While there are no direct examples in the provided data, the phrase is generally suitable for neutral and professional contexts. Alternative phrases, such as "interrupt his process" or "hinder his progress", can be used to convey similar meanings with subtle differences. When using the phrase, ensure clarity regarding whose workflow is being affected and what is causing the disruption.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

interrupt his process

Focuses on the action of breaking the continuity of his work.

disturb his routine

Emphasizes the disruption of his established work habits.

hinder his progress

Highlights the slowing down or obstruction of his work advancement.

impede his efficiency

Focuses on reducing the effectiveness of his work output.

obstruct his work

Implies a complete blockage or prevention of his work.

interfere with his tasks

Suggests an unwanted involvement that affects his work activities.

disrupt his work rhythm

Highlights the interruption of his natural pace and flow of work.

throw a wrench in his plans

An idiomatic expression indicating something that suddenly prevents him from carrying out his plans.

upset his work schedule

Emphasizes the disturbance of the planned timing of his work.

derail his productivity

Focuses on the act of causing his productivity to decline or fail.

FAQs

How can I use "disrupt his workflow" in a sentence?

You can use "disrupt his workflow" to describe situations where someone's work process is interrupted. For example, "The unexpected meeting would "interrupt his process" and cause delays."

What's a more formal way to say "disrupt his workflow"?

A more formal alternative to "disrupt his workflow" would be to "impede his efficiency" or "hinder his progress". These options convey a similar meaning with a more professional tone.

Is it always negative to "disrupt his workflow"?

While "disrupt his workflow" often implies a negative impact, it can sometimes be used neutrally to describe a change in process, without necessarily indicating harm. However, ensure context clarifies the intended meaning.

What can I say instead of "disrupt his workflow" to emphasize a sudden interruption?

To emphasize a sudden interruption, you could use phrases like "throw a wrench in his plans" or "upset his work schedule". These expressions suggest an abrupt and unexpected disruption.