Sentence examples for disproportionately onerous from inspiring English sources
Full compliance with regulations made for bigger ships would be "unreasonable and in some cases disproportionately onerous," it adds.
"The power to dominate Internet services and impose their demands upon them, the power to leverage a disproportionately onerous deal, the power to squeeze out the competition".
"Market power is why they're doing this," said Martin Mills, the founder of the independent Beggars Group, whose acts include the superstar Adele, "the power to dominate Internet services and impose their demands upon them, the power to leverage a disproportionately onerous deal, the power to squeeze out the competition".
The union argues that the cap has a disproportionately onerous effect on school districts in low-income areas, since the amount those districts can raise by increasing their tax levy under the cap is far less than what wealthy districts with a larger tax base can raise.
This can be disproportionately onerous for smaller and less well funded institutions and projects [ 41].
It should only come after repealing onerous regulations that disproportionately hurt small businesses (regulations that were likely created by collusion between big business and big government).
In the study, Race, Attorney Influence, and Bankruptcy Chapter Choice, researchers found that even after controlling for financial, demographic and other factors, lawyers, in part because of biases, were disproportionately steering black people into Chapter 13 (the more onerous and costly form of consumer bankruptcy).
The two major concerns with this kind of shareholder advocacy is that many ESG-focused proposals have nothing to do with increasing shareholder value, and that the onerous administrative requirements that often come with them disproportionately impact smaller companies that don't have adequate staff on-hand to deal with them.
This would mean far more onerous rent obligations for those receiving federal assistance that are likely to disproportionately impact families with children.
At a minimum, if the employer mandate is viewed as too onerous, then how could the individual mandate be any more palatable to the disproportionately low income families who will confront it next January?
