Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "dispositive for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to indicate that something is decisive or conclusive in determining an outcome.
Example: "The evidence presented was dispositive for the court's ruling in favor of the defendant."
Alternatives: "decisive for" or "conclusive for".
Exact(1)
Evidence-based medicine should have a role in deciding what is malpractice but will never be dispositive for a number of reasons.
Similar(58)
This shows that the law school seriously weighs many other diversity factors besides race that can make a real and dispositive difference for nonminority applicants as well.
When you see a story like this, it's also important to remember that the percentage of cases for which DNA testing is dispositive of guilt is very small.
But it is not dispositive of it; these methods are too crude to know for sure.
While "the mere possibility of tax consequences at the expiration of the 25-year repayment period is not dispositive of the issue of whether the [IBRP] represents a viable avenue for repayment of the student loan debt," it is a factor which may and should be considered based on the facts of a particular case.
To be sure, you wouldn't want the candidates' age to be the dispositive factor governing your choice for president.
"For the studios, that's the dispositive factor".
Disarmament may have been a sincere (if, it now appears, unwarranted) reason for war, but it wasn't dispositive.
"If this is not categorically dispositive evidence of innocence," said David Dow, a lawyer for Mr. Sutton, referring to the results of the DNA testing of sperm collected from the victim, "there is no such thing".
These built-in effects, while not necessarily large or dispositive in all cases, render the starting point for our analysis of vertical mergers more challenging than horizontal mergers.
For Zenawi to issue authoritative legal interpretation and dispositive declarations on what he concedes to be ambiguous questions of leasehold law is not only a travesty of justice but also an unconstitutional usurpation of judicial power.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com