Ceramic vegetable peelers, candles that change color as they burn, ironing boards, metal garbage cans, thermoses, closed-circuit television cameras, de-icers, hair-straightening irons, bread bins, rubber bands, shower-curtain hooks, CDs, cans of paint, children's underwear, wrapping paper — all displayed seemingly at random, all just an aisle or two away.
One sequence displayed events at random while the other sequence was either more streaky (positively autocorrelated) or more alternating (negatively autocorrelated) than chance.
It uses cues like contact info including phone numbers, and potentially also iMessage email addresses to see who's reaching out, and then selects an image to display partly at random, and partly based on weighted scores assigned to the frequency of any one image's use, star ratings, and even information about location, date and time.
The stimuli consisted of numbers (1 4) shown in random sequence and displayed at the points of a diamond-shaped box.
For a given shape, the order in which pairs were displayed was chosen at random.
As expected, the control Aβ42 in the absence of fatty acids displayed a random coil conformation at 0 h that converted to a β-sheet over a 10-day incubation period with a negative minimum at approximately 216 nm, suggesting conversion into fibrils (Figure 3A).
The sequences were displayed in random order.
The chronometer was strapped to the participant's forearm like a wristwatch, and was programmed to display a random number alternating at a period 6 ms faster than their determined threshold.
Finally, the budding pattern of the newly budded cells could not be investigated since arp2-1 mutant cells display a random budding pattern even at permissive temperature [21].
