a Translational velocity, b displacement, c armature current, d armature voltage.
Open image in new window Fig. 3 Map of factor of safety (a), critical acceleration (b), and Newmark displacement (c).
With a scaling ratio of displacement C L = 12, this is equivalent to settlements of 13.08 and 8.04 mm, respectively, in the prototype.
Comparison of country-wide data to capital city daily commuting profiles through respective probabilities of displacement (C) and mean inter-event migration distance (D).
Open image in new window Fig. 6 Shear test TW-CNL-15 performed on a wet shale steel interface under a constant normal load CNL (5, 10 and 12 MPa): a shear stress versus shear displacement, b normal stress versus normal displacement, c normal displacement versus shear displacement, d mobilized friction coefficient versus shear displacement.
Open image in new window Fig. 8 Shear test TW-CV-20 performed on a wet shale steel interface under constant volume: a shear stress versus shear displacement, b normal stress versus normal displacement, c normal displacement versus shear displacement, d mobilized friction coefficient versus shear displacement.
Open image in new window Fig. 3 Shear test TD-CNL-12 performed on dry shale steel interface under constant normal load CNL (5, 10 and 12 MPa): a shear stress versus shear displacement, b normal stress versus normal displacement, c normal displacement versus shear displacement, d mobilized friction coefficient versus shear displacement.
Open image in new window Fig. 4 Shear test TD-CV-18 performed on a dry shale steel interface under constant volume: a shear stress versus shear displacement, b normal stress versus normal displacement, c normal displacement versus shear displacement, d mobilized friction coefficient versus shear displacement.
Open image in new window Fig. 8 a Hysteretic behaviour of the masonry infill wall, b base shear top displacement, c shear-drift envelope and d energy dissipated results of experimental test and the numerical model.
Open image in new window Fig. 3 a A 27-year-old man sustained a fall from height and had a joint depression fracture type IIIB0; b the CT scan revealed orientation of fracture lines and degree of displacement; c, d, e, and f the postoperative lateral, anteroposterior, axial, and internal oblique radiographs.
The PC L3 nanocavity is formed by missing three air holes in a line in the center of the PC slab and can be further optimized by firstly tuning the displacement A of the first nearest pair of air holes and then tuning the displacement B of the second nearest pair of air holes and, finally, the displacement C of the third nearest pair of air holes, as shown in Figure 1a.
