This database includes drug-dispensing data from 719,022 patients with patient related information (age, sex, unique anonymous identifier), information on the dispensed drug (chemical substance coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system[ 25] and dispensed product), date of dispensing, amount dispensed and prescribed dosage regimen.
Look on the chart inside the dispensing station to convert the WC# to the proper dispensing amount or call your local propane dealer for the information).
As a limitation of these analyses, community (i.e., retail pharmacy) dispensing accounts only for a part (yet the large majority) of POA dispensing in Canada; in addition, dispensing amounts do not necessarily equate consumption data yet are a best available and closest measurable proxy indicator of POA consumption.
For all residents, the computerized drug dispensing histories contain data concerning the dispensed drug, prescriber specialty, dispensing date, dispensed amount, prescribed dose regimens, and the legend duration of use (prescription length).
For prescribed drugs, the register includes data on dispensed item, substance, brand name, formulation, package size, dispensed amount, dosage, expenditure, and reimbursement.
The computerised medication-dispensing histories contain data regarding dispensed medications, type of prescriber, dispensing date, dispensed amount of medication, prescribed dosage and length of prescription.
The register contains data on drugs (the prescribed and dispensed amount per item and drug costs per individual).
All accuracy error subtypes except dispensed amount showed a decrease or no change in error rates using FormularyScript, but only the decrease in which eye subtype reached statistical significance (0.5%0.1%%, p<0.001).
Key findings from this analysis were statistically significant (p<0.001) decreases in all legibility, incomplete and abbreviation error subtypes, except for legibility route, and incomplete which eye and dispensed amount.
An earlier roadside study 49 found that the use of medicinal drugs was underestimated by 17 59% when using data from a survey of drivers compared with actually dispensed amounts in the studied area.
It is worthy to note that the authors suggested a dose-response relationship: adjusted odds ratio for patients dispensed total amount 14 - 672 g of metformin was 0.83 (0.65 to 1.06), dispensed 673 - 964 g of metformin - 0.86 (0.68 to 1.10) and dispensed more than 964 g - 0.57 (0.43 to 0.75).
