The former difference seems to occur from disparities in modeling philosophy between studies, where short adenoma dwell times are based on assumption or expert opinion and long adenoma dwell times were calibrated to observed adenoma prevalence and polyp growth rates.
Thus, even when considering just 2 models, it proves impossible to determine exactly which model parameters are responsible for the disparity in model outcomes.
However, state-of-the-art population models have failed to capture heterogeneities in the risk of drug resistance among individuals, due to the disparity in model detail between population-level and within-host models.
Although we also report findings in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained as a measure of benefit to patients and society of reducing disparities, the primary endpoints in modeling the employer perspective were direct medical care expenses and cost of days missed from work.
Additional disparities became apparent in modelling long-term data obtained at high stresses which appeared to change the apparent age of the material, causing higher than expected creep rates.
A single class I disparity in this model generates chronic rejection associated with potent CD4+ T-cell responses induced by the indirect recognition pathway.
An exception was the measurement-model disparity in sensible heat flux under conditions of strong advection of dry air; the model diagnostics imply a marked insensitivity of pecan stomata to humidity that has not been reported earlier.
The disparity in death rates between models was one of the more surprising findings.
Finally, there is considerable disparity in opinions on the "model of integrative medicine".
Disparity in infarct volumes across models may be a result of experimental design and variation or could be due to species differences.
The magnitude of the risk estimates from period effects in the two-factor age-period model were more dissimilar to the corresponding full model, which would be expected given the wide disparity in R between the two models (Table 3), although the direction of change remained the same.
