Sentence examples for discussions whose from inspiring English sources

Mr. Uribe is a slight man at ease in policy discussions whose hobbies include yoga.

The thousands of monks of the Mundgod monasteries have been asked to follow the discussions — whose topics range from Quantum physics to neuroscience — in the Drepung Loseling Monastery's assembly hall here.

From the 1970's to the mid-90's, the diminutive Mr. Sonnabend could often be found chatting with visitors at his wife's gallery about art, literature or the movies, discussions whose range reflected an extensive, largely self-taught erudition.

And the parameters of that discussion, whose start has been deferred from this year to next, have yet to be set.

Wodeham's discussion is embedded in a larger Franciscan discussion, whose main players are Scotus and Walter Chatton on the one hand, and Ockham and Wodeham on the other.

This short paper is based on the first named author's final scientific conversations with Ludwik Finkelstein, it forms part of what was an on-going discussion whose aim was to bring together our work and perhaps to contribute to the further development of systems engineering.

That is, the slow slip events of this study are changing the stress state in favor of the occurrence of Nankai and Hyuga-nada earthquakes as mentioned in the discussion, whose probability is high considering the time since the last earthquakes.

Within two weeks the leader at the VA with whom we had initiated discussions, and whose name I did not publicly reveal, was nearly fired and cut off all discussions in fear for his job.

Before the Fangchenggang plant could be built, the local government had to buy the land from residents of a nearby fishing village, setting off discussions about whose land should be sacrificed, said Zhang Zhengde, a village elder.

But we need to separate [BDSM] from discussions of whose story is true".

Individual interviews were arranged for higher-ranking managers who were not available for group discussions, or whose participation might have prevented other participants (i.e., their subordinates) from talking freely about sensitive issues.