discussions together

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "discussions together" is not standard in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used in contexts where you want to emphasize that multiple parties are engaging in discussions as a group, but it is better to rephrase for clarity. Example: "We had productive discussions together about the project's future direction."

News & Media

Science

Academia

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Cockell plans to spend the summer pulling the discussions together into a final constitution.

BBC

"I was speaking with the boss, we had a couple of discussions together and he explained to me why I hadn't played too much until here.

The Guardian - Sport

They conducted endless discussions together in German, and Quine was lent the typescript of the book Carnap was writing, handed to him sheaf by sheaf from the typewriter as Carnap's wife Ina typed it.

The Guardian

Whereas when they have discussions together, or when they see farmers that are just like them, then they're much more likely to believe the content of the videos and adopt the farming practice.

MIT Technology Review

Despite a new agreement between the United States and North Korea to open discussions, together with China, the Korea experts had been worried that the coming meeting between Mr. Bush and Mr. Roh could be even more difficult than that last summit meeting.

The New York Times

And the historians always held discussions together to decide things, to determine how the scenes should look … There were descriptions alongside the historical information, and also a conclusion about what form the diorama should take.

Johns Hopkins University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

The response surface models for the fluidity characteristics are discussed in "Statistical models and discussion", together with detailed interpretations.

Applied Petrochemical Research

During the demonstration Linda Catt and an individual had a discussion together away from the main group".

The Guardian

These two aspects deserve a separate discussion, together with the putative physiological implications of our study.

Nature

So we covered all manner of subjects during our discussion together.

Forbes

It was in Paris, in 1970, when they were in a panel discussion together.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, consider using alternatives like "joint discussions" or "collaborative discussions" to emphasize the shared aspect of the interaction.

Common error

Avoid using "discussions together" when "discussions" already implies a group activity. Instead, focus on the type or purpose of the discussions, such as "strategic discussions" or "planning discussions".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "discussions together" functions as a noun phrase that describes a collaborative exchange of ideas or opinions. Ludwig AI points out that the phrase is not standard and can sound awkward, which is why it's often better to rephrase for clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

40%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "discussions together" describes a collaborative exchange of ideas but is often considered redundant. Ludwig AI suggests that the phrase, while not strictly incorrect, is not standard in written English and might sound awkward. For improved clarity and conciseness, alternatives such as "joint discussions" or "collaborative discussions" are generally preferable. The phrase appears across various contexts, including news, science, and academia, but is most common in scientific and news-related sources. When you want to emphasize the collaborative nature of such exchanges, do so but avoid redundancy, such as "working together". Be concise and accurate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

joint discussions

Emphasizes the shared or collaborative nature of the discussions.

collaborative discussions

Highlights the cooperative aspect of the discussions.

shared discussions

Focuses on the commonality and mutual participation in the discussions.

group discussions

Indicates discussions involving a number of participants.

collective dialogues

Uses a more formal term ("dialogues") to emphasize the joint nature of the interaction.

combined deliberations

Emphasizes the careful consideration involved in the discussions.

integrated conversations

Highlights the intertwined or seamless quality of the conversations.

unified dialogues

Suggests that the dialogues are aligned and contribute to a common understanding.

concurrent discussions

Implies that the discussions are happening simultaneously or in parallel.

mutual consultations

Focuses on the advisory and reciprocal nature of the discussions.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "discussions together" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives like "joint discussions", "collaborative discussions", or "shared discussions" to emphasize the group aspect. The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "discussions together" grammatically incorrect?

While not strictly incorrect, "discussions together" can sound redundant or awkward. The word "discussions" inherently implies more than one person is involved. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, so it's better to use more concise alternatives for clearer communication.

What's the difference between "discussions" and "discussions together"?

"Discussions" is the standard term for a communicative exchange. Adding "together" emphasizes the collective aspect, but it is often unnecessary. If you want to highlight the collaborative nature, consider "joint discussions" instead.

When is it appropriate to use "discussions together"?

Although generally avoidable, "discussions together" might be appropriate when contrasting group discussions with individual reflection, or to specifically highlight that a group, rather than individuals, engaged in dialogue. However, clearer alternatives usually exist.