Suggestions(3)
Exact(1)
Task-focussed activity was relatively high in both revised (73.9%), and unrevised paper discussions (69.5%), but, in absolute terms, the task-focussed activity in the revised paper discussions was double as high as in the unrevised paper discussions (P < .000).000
Similar(59)
Adopting the method of conversation analysis, the researchers found that "interaction strategies contribute to improving the effectiveness of communication and accomplishing the communication goals in the discussion" (p. 78).
Finally, if v ∈ X p is a fixed point, then by the preceding discussion p ( u, u ) = lim n p ( T n v, T n v ) = lim n p ( u, T n v ), i.e., p ( u, u ) = p ( v, v ) = p ( u, v ) so u = v. □.
The theory of direct reference for names is so intimately associated with the theory that names are rigid de jure that some philosophers have supposed that names cannot be rigid in this way, because names are not directly referential (see Fitch's 2004 discussion, p. 54).
Second, the sentence in the third paragraph of the "Discussion" (p. 262) was incorrect.
Only the IG significantly increased over time with intention to initiate discussion (P < 0.001) and actual initiation of discussion about (P < 0.001) preconception counseling and reproductive health with their diabetes health care team (Table 1).
None of these LA behaviors was likely to be followed by the end of student discussion (p < 0.05 for all of the above, chi-square test).
Abstract 6th Line from end and Results and Discussion p. 5 1st Line of 2nd paragraph – what is in the gcu14-aacA4 circular form?
Results and Discussion p. 5 – most of the 1L core site and the 1R core site of the bla GES attC site are present.
Results and Discussion p. 5 – most of the 1L core site and the 1R core site of the blaGES attC site are present.
In the first and second paragraphs of the "Discussion" (p. 213), the age range has been changed from 50 55 years of age to 55 60 years of age.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com