Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
To determine the potential factors affecting students' percent correct on revotes, we looked at the subset of discussions for which we had both initial and revotes recorded, and more than one person per group responding.
In the 17 discussions for which the initial vote for that group of students was above 70% correct, the students still spent on average 42% of the discussion explaining their reasoning, similar to the overall average for all discussions (39%).
Similar(57)
"An awful lot of people have made an enormous amount of money and are scared what it is going to do to their kids," said Dale Burch, who organized the box lunch and panel discussion for which tickets cost between $100 and $500.
The Daily is an aggregation site; David trawls the Web deep and wide and comes up with an astonishingly rich array of movie-related news and discussion, for which his site is an absolutely crucial source.
So an -path tapped-delay line model is adopted in the discussion, for which the impulse response from the i th transmit antenna to the j th receive antenna can be described as (3).
Excluded from further consideration from the supplements were any introductory or concluding remarks or discussion for which an on-line abstract is not available.
The results are clearly presented and extensively rationalized in the discussion, for which the authors must be commended.
It is self-evident that members of the public would be reluctant to participate in technical discussion for which they are not equipped.
Note that random errors to human factors are excluded from the discussion below for which the readers can refer to (Dai and Lu 2010) for detail.
This informed curriculum design decisions to make most large group didactic sessions optional, give greater emphasis to case-based discussion groups for which students rotated leadership roles, and conduct and report on focused field work based on topics small groups of students selected.
The main limitation of this paper is that it focuses on AHP with several rounds of discussions for GDM, which is lack of generalizability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com