Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Team members made preliminary investigations of public-facing websites at the institutions in the western U.S. Through an iterative process of review, reflection, synthesis, and discussion team members devised a checklist to apply to all 17 sites.
Similar(59)
After group discussion, teams had to simultaneously display their consensus answer on a card; each team could thus see all other teams' choices.
Within the contexts of classroom discussions, team meetings inside and outside the classroom, and field-based activities in preschool settings, student teams learn how to engage in ICP (ICP) using a consultation model.
With Discussions, teams can check back later, view what they had initially agreed on, and just generally have one place where their work-related conversations live.
Alternatively, discussion within teams may let team members see the decision problem in a different perspective, and thus creating strategically sophisticated team decisions.
Piers Jones, from the Discussion development team, has left a comment about this bug fix.
We present here a discussion among team members as part of an ethical approach to communication designed to help each participant invest in his/her own experience.
Disagreements were resolved by discussion with team members.
After discussion, the team decided whether the patient was eligible for registration.
Before initiating any discussion, the team also took written assent from all FGD participants.
Emerging findings were presented for discussion at team meetings, which facilitated further interpretation and refinement of themes and concepts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com