LAST week the IMF hosted a research conference in honour of Stanley Fischer, which generated a heaping portion of fascinating monetary-policy discussion (some of which we discuss in this week's paper).
During one classroom discussion, some of her peers discussed how the Rwandan genocide was "timely" for political reasons.
In Section "Simulation results and discussion", some simulation results are presented and discussed.
During that discussion, some developing country representatives indicated that they were not prepared to discuss this subject and chose to leave the meeting.
After the discussion, some audience members asked questions.
Some things should not be under discussion; some things are known and settled science.
But the story includes some Muslim-Jewish political discussion, some drug-taking, and the circumcision of a pig.
To those who have been following the discussion, some of the ground that the film treads will seem well worn.
"Are you making a statement by assiduously avoiding the discussion?" Some on the anti-abortion side seem to think so.
During a post-production discussion, some students even showed precocious signs of the kind of self-possession that sets the opera greats apart.
There is some discussion, some awareness, but not enough, because to me that is the central crisis of American movies: the disappearing middle of the mainstream.
