In the context of the ongoing discussions on interpretation of serological methods, we have used 'presence of anti-phase II IgM and anti-phase II IgG antibodies' rather than the term 'recent infection' in the present study.
J.W.T.H. led the discussion on the interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript.
The discussion on the interpretation of quantum theory is wide open, however.
A detailed discussion on data interpretation and comparison to traditional solubility measurement using solid material is presented.
Discussion on the interpretation of the ΔT g values presented by Saiter et al. [35] has shown that the higher the ΔT g values, the larger the width of time distributions characterizing molecular dynamics, and therefore the higher long-scale structural disorder in the materials is expected.
(In the Supporting Information –file Text S1- we provide more technical details of all calculations involved as well as a brief additional discussion on their interpretation).
We also thank Meir Stampfer, Lorelei Mucci and Jing Ma, Harvard school of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA for valuable input in the discussion on and interpretation of the results.
The codebooks were then refined into a master codebook through comparison and categorization, with discrepancies resolved through discussion on the interpretation of the codes and their properties and dimensions [ 37].
Besides a critical discussion on the interpretation of results and associated pitfalls and risks of the method, we will also outline the potential benefits for TES as a future intervention technique in children with learning difficulties and discuss its potential role in ameliorating associated learning deficits.
We thank M. Torn for discussions on the interpretation and implication of the results, and A. Ukkola and I. C. Prentice for early methodological discussions.
We are grateful to Dr. Venkat Srinivasan at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for stimulating discussions on the interpretation of impedance data and to Dr. Sylvio Indris at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology for discussions on NMR relaxometry.
