Discussion In this example, the best lower approximation (amongst the three) is given by 1 2 e − 1 J n, 2 ( x, y ), and the best upper approximation is given by e − 1 J n, 1 ( x, y ), where x = ( 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, …, 1 ) and y = ( 1, …, 1 ).
Discussion In this example, the best lower approximation (amongst the five) is given by 2 ( 0.1 ) 3 / 2 J n, 3 / 2, and the best upper approximation is given by ( 3 / 2 ) J n, 1 ( x, y ), where x = ( 0.2, 0.201, 0.202, …, 1 ), y = ( 1, …, 1 ).
In line with the discussion in the previous example, the difference is x 2.5 − x 10 and the standard deviation SD = SDHFUPR = c + d × x 10.
The comic, The United States vs PFC Bradley Manning: A Graphic Account from Inside the Courtroom, will include drawings of events that illustrate the matters under discussion in the courtroom – for example, the war in Afghanistan – and text from the trial transcript.
We have incorporated the discussion of such an interaction in the discussion, citing the example of PleD.
I am convinced that it will form an excellent basis for discussion in, for example, the Convention.
To simplify the discussion, consider the example illustrated in Figure 1.
As noted in the initial discussion of the example, if the legal and musical careers were of equal value, then a slightly improved version of the legal career would be better than the musical career, but this judgment appears incorrect.
We acknowledge there are elements that may in particular be the subject of further discussion in the wider community, for example, the issue of split reporting.
However, if a decision-maker experiences H I >B I, the threshold probability is always higher than the EUT threshold (see below for discussion in the context of medical example).
