Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
There are other tools and approaches that partially solve some of these problems and these are discussed and compared to GeneSeer in the discussion section.
Equipment requirements are discussed and compared to previous standards.
The output model is discussed and compared to available lithospheric field models ("Results" section).
(2015) are discussed and compared to those of the experiment run on the same datasets.
Finally, punch wear predictions have been discussed and compared to experimental results.
The technical consequences for each of the approaches presented are discussed and compared to each other.
The cracking mechanisms were discussed and compared to that obtained at room temperature.
The difference of results between the models are discussed and compared to the actual test data.
Simulation results are discussed and compared to show the effectiveness of the proposed market design.
Results are discussed and compared to those of two previous studies in adults.
Embrittlement and de-embrittlement mechanisms are discussed and compared to these observations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com