Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Since an error base is identified by comparing with the consensus, we first discuss consensus base recalculation using read alignment information.
We already devoted a significant portion of the manuscript to discuss consensus tree approaches and their limitations; however, we do not think it will improve readability of the manuscript if we add a more detailed discussion of other approaches that use phylogenetic information retained in gene families to detect plurality and conflicting phylogenetic signals.
Similar(58)
Discrepancies were discussed, consensus was achieved, and the cultural appropriateness of the translation was confirmed.
As discussed, consensus guidelines dictate that the diagnosis is made with use of compatible clinical, endoscopic, and histologic characteristics.
Results were subsequently discussed until consensus was reached.
In cases of disagreement, the study was discussed until consensus was reached.
Cases where the two researchers disagreed were discussed until consensus was reached.
Discrepancies were discussed until consensus.
Disagreements were discussed for consensus.
Any discrepancies were discussed and consensus reached.
Differences were discussed until consensus was reached.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com