The phrase "discriminatory without" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is discriminatory or biased, without any valid reason or justification. Example: The company's hiring policies were found to be discriminatory without any basis in qualifications or abilities.
A poorly designed system can be more costly, cumbersome and discriminatory without being more accurate in its ability to differentiate good teachers from bad.
"We've had to use statements by judges [in support of the associates who write the briefs presenting them in court] to convince even our female clients to allow female associates to appear in court," she said, because there was no direct way to call the behavior discriminatory without alienating the client.
Soon after the decision by District Court Judge Vaughn Walker, the White House issued a statement condemning Proposition 8 as "divisive and discriminatory" without elaborating further.
The first-order was appropriately seen as unrefined and possibly religiously discriminatory without providing adequate due process to those who already had relationships with the United States based on permanent residency or issued visas.
One court in Sweden recently found that the Kremlin's expropriation of the company was "unlawful, not in the public interest, discriminatory and without payment of compensation".
But, in so intimate a struggle as the one between Palestinians and Israelis, it is never the case that a leader of one side could impose such an unfair and discriminatory vision without the assistance of the other side.
Twenty years ago, a conservative majority of the court held that employees could not sue for racial harassment, and made it nearly impossible to bring cases with proven discriminatory impact without a smoking gun of intentional racism.
Often people can act on implicit bias in prejudicial and discriminatory ways without even realizing it, such as assuming a black man is less qualified for a job than a white man, despite having similar résumés and skill sets.
It concluded that discrimination in voter registration and voting and the dilution of minority votes can still be prevented only through the preclearance process and that there would be more discriminatory efforts without the law's deterrent force.
Do you really believe that, in this day and age, in the United States of America, and in California no less, a university could implement an overtly racially discriminatory policy without inciting a firestorm?In fact, the campuses in question are tinkering with all admission requirements, reducing the weighting given to standardised test scores.
They harbor unconscious racial prejudices that can cause them to engage in discriminatory conduct without consciously realizing they are doing so.
