Sentence examples for discriminations effect from inspiring English sources

When the delay between the floor inserts and the presence/absence of reward was increased, mice took longer to acquire the simple discriminations (effect of delay, F 1,24) = 12.5; p < 0.002; Fig. 1D).

And the replacement of intent with effect as the standard for determining discrimination — effect is the standard that affirmative-action programs use — contributed to a white backlash.

The discrimination effect was enhanced by the non-uniform adsorption of gas molecules on the top, side and bottom regions of the resonator.

The observed discrimination effect (ratio of charge transfer resistance, RCT, between the hybridized and non-complementary hybridized surfaces) for the different ternary surfaces followed the order of HS-ssDNA/MCH/MUDA (1.89) > HS-ssDNA/MPA/MCH (1.37) > HS-ssDNA/MCH/MUD (1.27) > HS-ssDNA/MPA/MUD (0) = HS-ssDNA/MPA/MUDA (0).

Interestingly, the discrimination effect was stronger for everyday slights and suspicions (including whether people felt harassed or threatened, or whether they felt others were afraid of them) than for more dramatic events like being denied a job or promotion or being unfairly detained or questioned by police.

In addition, when the two improved CHI formulas are compared, the first improved method has a slight advantage, showing a better discrimination effect in the preceding categories.

In contrast, in choice tests in small test arenas, no kin discrimination effect was observed.

F1 values over 0.75 and significant p-values for the ranksum test indicate a strong discrimination effect of partial correlation coefficients concerning direct vs. indirect pathway interactions.

The context discrimination effect ((CS+ > CS−)A > (CS+ > CS− B) was significant when comparing A1 late to B1 late (t(22) = 2.4, P = 0.013).

For this reason, there was a significant discrimination effect (Fig. 5), that is, shorter latencies to dig in the correct location (F 1,17) = 136.8, P < 0.001), as well as an improvement with training (session effect, F 7,119) = 15.9, P < 0.001).

The coelution of species III and IV as well as I and II is acceptable since these analytes originate from the anammox bacteria in constant relative concentrations, thus keeping an eventual discrimination effect during analysis constant.