discriminated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "discriminated with" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It is not typically used in written English, and the intended meaning may be unclear without additional context. Example: "He felt that he was discriminated with unfair treatment at work."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Action potentials were discriminated with a window discriminator (Bak Electronics, Mount Airy, MD, USA).

European Journal of Neuroscience

Neuronal discharge was discriminated with a dual time amplitude window discriminator and digitized together with eye position and target position signals at 500 Hz using a 16-bit A/D board.

Cerebral Cortex

Subsequently, with aid of classic partial least square discriminant analysis (PLSDA), all the green teas can be discriminated with high sensitivity, specificity and a satisfactory recognition rate of 100% for training set and 98.3% for prediction set, respectively.

Analytica Chimica Acta

All patients had a significant metabolic response to NAC, and pre- and post-treatment spectra could be discriminated with 87.9%/68.9% classification accuracy by paired/unpaired partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) (p < 0.001).

BMC Cancer

"Then, as now, vigilantes terrorized and discriminated with guns.

The New York Times

Sagittal plane movements were linearly discriminated with 100% accuracy for tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius.

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

However, certain habitat characteristics such as canopy structure and topographic factors are not well discriminated with these passive, optical datasets.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Neutrophils and mononuclear cells were discriminated based on forward and sideward scatter46,47 and live and dead cells were discriminated with DAPI staining.

Nature

In the testing process, the outputs by this unified network are discriminated with a threshold value to produce the ultimate prediction for the face verification task.

Neurocomputing

Agricultural processes of expansion, segmentation, and intensification can also be discriminated, with distinct zones of the field system having undergone different mixes of development.

Journal of Archaeological Science

Malaoxon and paraoxon in composite solutions of 0 5 μg/l were discriminated with predication errors of 0.9 and 1.6 μg/l, respectively.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "discriminated with" in formal writing. Opt for more standard phrases like "discriminated against", "differentiated by", or "distinguished by" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Many writers incorrectly use "discriminated with" when they intend to convey the meaning of "discriminated against". Remember that "discriminate" typically requires "against" to indicate the target of the discriminatory action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "discriminated with" is typically used as a passive construction, attempting to describe how something is distinguished or treated differently. However, as Ludwig AI suggests, it's grammatically unconventional.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

8%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "discriminated with" appears frequently across diverse sources, as seen in Ludwig, especially within scientific and news-related content. However, it's vital to note that Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Standard English prefers alternatives such as "discriminated against", "differentiated by" or "distinguished by". When writing, selecting the more grammatically sound option ensures clarity and enhances the credibility of your communication, especially in formal contexts. While "discriminated with" might be encountered, opting for established alternatives is advisable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

discriminated against

Focuses on biased action directed against someone or something.

differentiated by

Highlights specific characteristics that set items or groups apart.

distinguished by

Emphasizes notable differences that make something recognizable.

singled out by

Stresses the act of being chosen or identified, often with a negative connotation.

separated by

Indicates a clear division or boundary between entities.

treated unfairly with

Highlights unjust or inequitable actions or conditions.

biased due to

Focuses on the prejudice affecting judgements or actions.

identified through

Focuses on means of recognition of a trait or characteristic.

categorized using

Highlights classification based on certain attributes.

segregated based on

Emphasizes the separation of groups often implies inequitable actions.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the word "discriminate"?

The word "discriminate" is most commonly followed by "against", as in "discriminated against". It means to treat a person or group of people unfairly.

What can I use instead of "discriminated with"?

Consider using alternatives like "discriminated against", "differentiated by", or "distinguished by" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "discriminated with" grammatically correct?

No, "discriminated with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is typically "discriminated against".

What's the difference between "discriminated with" and "discriminated against"?

"Discriminated against" means to treat someone unfairly. "Discriminated with" is not a standard English phrase and should be avoided in favor of grammatically correct alternatives.