Sentence examples for discretion laws from inspiring English sources

While the new detainer discretion laws shield individuals like Teddy Irving while they're in custody, that protection can only last so long.

Sarah Vendzules, an attorney for Brooklyn Defender Services, testified in front of the New York City Council in October on the prevalence of courthouse arrests and home raids that her office was dealing with following the passage of the 2014 reforms, known as the Detainer Discretion Laws.

When such an arrest is made, ICE officers have developed specific, detailed information about the target, to include photographs and other personally identifiable information". While the new detainer discretion laws shield individuals like Teddy Irving while they're in custody, that protection can only last so long.

The critics also said that, by removing judges' discretion, the laws have resulted in low-level drug addicts facing longer sentences than drug kingpins.

Indeed, the harsh 1996 no-discretion deportation laws, combined with the no-discretion enforcement and prosecutorial practices ordered by the new President, virtually guarantee the tragic consequences for Mr. Lee and his family of the legal misadvice he received.

A Federal handgun permit would establish national standards and controls, eliminate police abuses of discretion, benefit law enforcement and the public, and generate revenue for the Government through licensing fees and firearms-education and safety-training programs, and none of this at taxpayer expense.

A law that would have required a gun buyer to apply for and get a permit at the discretion of law enforcement could have empowered authorities to deny the shooter access to an AR-15.

George P. Fletcher, Some Unwise Reflections about Discretion, 47(4) Law & Contemp.

To briefly summarize, Obama's policy is constitutional, and well with the scope of presidential discretion over law enforcement.

The lawyer acknowledged that he was worried by the broad discretion the law allows a judge in deciding who should have won the election.

In addition to addressing an extremely important area of immigration policy, the case also raises broader questions about the scope of presidential discretion over law enforcement.