Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
In case of a discrepant score for a categorical parameter, a consensus was determined by a third evaluation.
In case of a discrepant score for a categorical parameter, a consensus was determined by the two observers.
The cases with a discrepant score by the two observers were re-examined with a gynaecological pathologist, until consensus was reached.
For example, the discrepant score for 'identity' between internal and external evaluations allows for an exploration of what constitutes a strong identity for research ethics at the University of Botswana and how it can be strengthened.
Similar(56)
The highest value was used if the three cores from a patient showed discrepant scores.
Discrepant scores were resolved by consensus.
Discrepant scores were reviewed to reach consensus.
In cases of discrepant scoring, a consensus score was reached after re-evaluation.
For the few instances of discrepant scoring, a consensus score was determined.
Discrepant scores between the two observers were rescored to arrive at a single final score.
In the few instances of discrepant scoring, a consensus score was determined with a multiheaded microscope.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com