Sentence examples for discrepancy would have from inspiring English sources

If the Index was weighted by market caps, the discrepancy would have been less, since Apple's market cap is 6.7 times larger than GE's as of Friday's close.

In the worst-case scenario, the documentation discrepancy would have sent her home on the next flight to Kathmandu.

At that point you would sell short the overpriced index and buy the underlying stocks, knowing that ultimately the discrepancy would have to be reconciled, either by a fall in the index or a rise in the stocks.

This discrepancy would have been much larger without matching; a non-ragpicker with one year of schooling was often matched to a ragpicker with no schooling.

These results call attention to a discrepancy in research findings by subject matter: for Listeria sp. climatic and environmental aspects are a minor area of published research, in contrast to Vibrio sp. and Cryptosporidium sp. Because climate and climate change were required terms of our search, this discrepancy would have been even more distorted without these search requirements.

Whereas cohort estimates of 10-year survival available in 1985–1989 would have been between 10.2 and 13.5percentt units lower than the 10-year survival rates later observed for children diagnosed in that period, the discrepancy would have been between 0.6 and 3.5percentt units only for the period estimates.

The former governor and his staff will not face criminal charges, but Mr. Soares said in his report that Mr. Spitzer's statements to the district attorney's office conflicted with that of Mr. Dopp and that the discrepancies would have been presented before a grand jury had the governor not resigned.

In addition, perceptual discrepancies would have been removed in the process of fingerprinting the audio file.

Class 3 discrepancies would have resulted in a patient's severe clinical deterioration.

They reviewed 28 autopsies in critically ill bone marrow transplant patients and found that only 7% of discrepancies would have altered therapy and none would have altered outcome.

A reader, unaware of retraction status and applying a cut-off point of three or more discrepancies, would have identified retracted papers with 70% sensitivity and 66% specificity (fig 3).