Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
SNPs with minor allele frequency < 0.05 were discarded, and then segregation discrepancy was checked within families.
The two database copies were compared using Epidata (Version 3.1; Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark) and each discrepancy was checked against the original data forms.
Similar(58)
Data was entered in duplicate in MS-Excel (MicroSeattlerp., Seattle WA) and discrepancies were checked against the forms and laboratory records.
Discrepancies were checked against the raw data.
The data was cleaned, any discrepancies were checked against the original questionnaires and the accuracy of data entry was verified.
Data were double entered in EpiData 3.1 (The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark, 2003 2008) and discrepancies were checked against the raw data.
Discrepancies were checked against the crude data.
These discrepancies were checked through gap analysis and literature mining.
All discrepancies were checked manually in patients' records.
A 20% random sample was double-entered and discrepancies were checked against raw data.
All discrepancies were checked and rectified by the translators, and the research team [ 19].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com