This discrepancy is attributable to polling companies reporting only one of four major sources of error, as we describe below.
This discrepancy is attributable to relatively low soil water potential in the control treatment owing to the very dry summer: ΨS did not rise over −80 kPa in July.
This discrepancy is attributable to both the scatter of the data points in the first and last 6 hours of sampling due to CSF collection occurring at slightly different times of day across the AbbVie studies and a limited sampling time of 24 hours, the shortest period among all of the sponsors.
It seems unlikely that this discrepancy is attributable to a difference in the ELISA method (e.g. assay for total MMP-9 in this study versus active MMP-9 in the earlier report), because our patients showed a strong correlation between total MMP-9 and active MMP-9 in the additional test using the ELISA kit (R&D Systems; r = 0.745, P < 0.001; data not shown).
Regardless of whether monosites or heterosites are used, both NHR bound with the same relative degree to each binding site (Table S4 .What discrepancies were attributable to a small number of low order binding sites of approximately 1.5 2 fold enrichment where occupancy of the heterodimer partner could not be detected.
In the first case study (Table 1), discrepancies were attributable to the evidence under consideration by the C8 panel.
Our analysis has quantified these discrepancies on a global level, uncovering many more cases where pairwise discrepancies are attributable to similar issues (Examples 4 6 in the Supplementary Discussion S3).
On the basis of information in these three studies, it is not likely that the discrepancies are attributable to differences in tumour grade of sample sets, whereas patient ethnicity (not given in the publications cited) and details of mutation analysis protocols merit attention in further investigations on the role of KLF6 mutations in prostate cancer.
According to clinical experience, this discrepancy was attributable mainly to social factors, including time consumption in considering and arranging for placement and caregivers on discharge (Table 6).
The discrepancy in these values was attributable to phenotypic plasticity, overlooked diversity, range extensions for some species and recognition that some genera are in need of substantial taxonomic revision in the North American flora.
