Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The median discrepancy percentage for all drugs was 66%.
Similar(59)
Previous studies found discrepancy percentages between 15 and 40%%, including both grade and histological subtype [ 13– 17].
However, the vast majority of this discrepancy (23 percentage points out of 27) is, as I have shown in this post, due to data discontinuities.
In the hydrodynamic and water quality modeling (Havens and James, [2005]; Havens et al., [2004]), it is often useful to express the observation-prediction discrepancies in percentage to measure the model performance.
There may be discrepancies in percentage calculations in previously published data if missing values were not discarded.
The discrepancy between percentages reported by self-reported questionnaire and cord blood cotinine level that identify newborns from smoking mothers could be explained if one takes into consideration that the questionnaire inquires about the entire gestational period while the analytical value of cord blood cotinine refers only to the end of the pregnancy.
Differences in age, social setting, analysis parameters, and the use of five versus ten distinct categories may explain the discrepancies in percentages reported by Panksepp and coworkers [24] and the present data.
Any discrepancies in percentages are due to rounding.
Any discrepancies in percentages are due to missing data.
EUCAST breakpoints for cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor, based on PK/PD breakpoints, are 4- and 5-fold dilution lower than those of CLSI respectively and this shift translated into major and very major discrepancies when percentages of susceptible strains were calculated using the two criteria.
There is however a discrepancy between the percentage of animals losing locomotion and the percentage of animals depleted in muscle myosin; there are at least twice as many animals losing locomotion that there are animals depleted in muscle myosin.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com