Exact(5)
But the discrepancy is very large and has grown enormously over the last few years.
The discrepancy is very small, but it isn't an observational error.
Considering the approximations of the model, this discrepancy is very low.
The discrepancy is very likely due to the difference of the administration mode.
This discrepancy is very likely to involve the differences in the utility of factors, such as JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, Tyk2, NF-κB, IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) and/or STATs (e.g. STAT-1 activated by IFN-γ; STAT-3 activated by IL-6), thereby creating a positive and a negative regulation for P-NPC and BM-NPC cells respectively [ 47].
Similar(54)
In some cases the mapping discrepancy was very clear because two different chromosomes were involved (for ARS-BFGL-NGS-317, for instance, see DCM_3-2 in Additional File 5).
The degree of discrepancy was very large (>2 SD) at values above 0.7 μg/L (i.e. in the region of values suggestive of brain injury).
Gnathologically oriented practitioners believe that the tolerance of the humanbody for centric relation to maximum intercuspation discrepancies is very small, 0.5 mm transversely and 1.0 mm anteroposteriorly and vertically.
The number of discrepancies is very low.
The discrepancies were very few and, as they pertained to the nature of costs incurred, they were not considered to be significant.
These large discrepancies are very confusing for the reader.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com