Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
2 Results also indicated that outcomes promoted from primary to secondary between the protocol and the review were more likely to report statistically significant meta-analysis results in comparison to reviews where there was no discrepancy in outcome specification with the review protocol (relative risk 1.66 95% CI (1.10 to 2.49), p=0.02).
The reason for such discrepancies in performance specification is often related to neglect of process system analysis and long- and short-term process flow requirements, when arriving at the specified pump performance characteristics.
The Note 5 has had a significant jump in specifications.
The two series vary slightly in specifications.
A secondary objective was to quantify the risk of bias in a set of meta-analyses where discrepancies between outcome specifications in protocols and reviews were found.
The discrepancy in size is attributable to omission of site-specific details about protein-protein interactions in ODE models and the simplifying assumptions of ODE models that are introduced for the sake of making model specification feasible.
Sixty-four (22%) of 288 reviews contained a discrepancy in at least one outcome measure of which 48 (75%) were attributable to changes in the specification of at least one primary outcome measure.
Friedel remembers the discrepancy in 1992.
So why the discrepancy in numbers?
"There is a huge discrepancy in Brazil.
Discrepancy in dates of the charges pointed out.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com