Sentence examples for discrepancy in comparison from inspiring English sources

Our formula allows a quick evaluation of the magnetic shielding for design application to a superconducting radio-frequency cavity with less than 10% discrepancy in comparison with that obtained from pure numerical simulations.

The results from the CFD simulations highlight the non-homogeneity of autoignition and reveal significant quantitative discrepancy in comparison to homogeneous modeling, particularly for the hot ignition delay in the ntc regime.

It is also likely that the vocabulary size stipulated in the CECR has greater discrepancy in comparison with the CEFR.

However, we note a discrepancy in comparison to tabulated values.

The predicted distribution of solid particles shows some discrepancies in comparison with the measurements, but the agreement is significantly improved for higher impeller speeds.

It is demonstrated that the proposed temperature control scheme can retain a stable operation around the vicinity of the nominal steady state with improved dynamic performance and tolerable steady state discrepancies in comparison with the direct composition control scheme.

In general, similar trends and behaviour during the whole day were noticed, although the increase in the distillate production of the numerical results reveals discrepancies in comparison with the predicted experimental results, and in particular, around mid day, the differences were more substantial.

The phylogeny for the bacteriorhodopsin (BR) protein revealed two discrepancies in comparison to the RpoB' marker, while the halorhodopsin (HR) tree showed incongruence to both markers.

CDS results had less number of major and minor category discrepancies in comparison to CLSI and CDS method showed excellent correlation coefficient (r=1) with Etest for all five antimicrobial agents tested in comparison to CLSI (r=0.92).

Analysis of genes revealed the presence of both K7-acquired and K7-lost genes, in addition to numerous others with segmentations and terminal discrepancies in comparison with those of S288C.

In the present study, CDS results' correlation was excellent with Etest MICs that had less number of major and minor category discrepancies in comparison to CLSI disc diffusion technique, that is, 2 and 52 versus 16 and 133.