Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Morgan Pratchett from James Cook University, a member of the taskforce, told Guardian Australia the discrepancy could be a result of different methodologies, or surveys being conducted at different times.
This discrepancy could be a result of two very different recruitment strategies: Morrison et al.
A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be a confounding effect of the variable recall period for IPV.
This result does not coincide with our results in either expression or in timing, and this discrepancy could be a result of the different experimental designs.
One possible reason for this discrepancy could be a difference in how amenable hypoglycemic episodes are to detection and prevention in type 1 versus type 2 diabetes.
He says that discrepancy could be a challenge for pathologists trying to compare the dose-related incidence of basophilic foci in chemically treated animals with background lesions in untreated controls.
Similar(50)
This discrepancy could be an issue with the model constructed, the computational methodology, and/or detection problems in the spectra collection.
This discrepancy could be an effect of the lower metabolic flux during xylose consumption, thus requiring a longer period of time to recover from the redox perturbation caused by HMF and furfural.
One possible, though still speculative, explanation for this discrepancy could be an indication bias contending that, before the SAVOR TIMI results were published, DPP-4i use was well regarded and considered particularly safe in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or renal insufficiency.
Discrepancies could be an early and accessible signal of unreliability in clinical trial reports.
One possible reason for this discrepancy could be that a substantial proportion of the implants investigated in that study were Mallory-Head cups, a cup type that was not investigated in our study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com