Sentence examples for discrepancies I from inspiring English sources

In this article, we emphasize a third possible reason behind such discrepancies, i.e. the fact that the external classification itself may possess its own limitations.

If there were any large discrepancies (i.e., <80% alignment using ΔSUV), we further investigated the reason for this low alignment percentage.

These binge triggers include discrepancies (i.e., viewing oneself as falling short of one's mother's expectations), depressive affect (i.e., feeling miserable and sad), and dietary restraint (i.e., behaviors aimed at reduced caloric intake).

In particular, Fe3+ and Co3+ ions generate more effective oxidation state discrepancies, i.e., more Ti3+ defect structures and surface transformations than the other metal ions (Cr3+, Mn2+, and Ni2+).

Two possible reasons may explain these discrepancies: i) Several peptidases are not functional and, therefore, they have not force the increasing of the inhibitor members to regulate them; ii) Several inhibitors are not regulating endogenous peptidases and have proliferated to actually inhibit the peptidases used by the pests and pathogens to attack the plant.

This allows sites to distinguish unintentional medication discrepancies (i.e., due to reconciliation errors) from intentional medication changes.

We contrast the equilibrium outcomes with German market data and find a substantial discrepancy, i.e., non-competitive prices.

Number-theoretic methods (NTMs) are adopted to generate samples with low discrepancy, i.e., uniformly scattered in the domain, where discrepancy is a quantitative measurement of the uniformity.

The larger the discrepancy (i.e., the degree of mismatch), the greater is the potential for the worker to increase their wage by finding a match.

When these class II patients are asked to posture their lower jaw forward in a class I molar relationship, this transverse discrepancy (i.e., maxillary constriction) can be observed clinically [3].

In the case of discrepancy (i.e. >30%), a third microscopist reviewed the slides and the principal investigator made the final classification.