Sentence examples for discourse toward from inspiring English sources
"discourse toward" is a valid and commonly used phrase in written English
It is used to describe the way in which someone speaks or communicates about a particular topic or subject. Example: The politician's discourse toward immigration was filled with divisive language and fear-mongering tactics.
Leftist students use an anti-imperialist discourse toward the United States and say they have no plans to overthrow the Iranian government.
13 Arab newspapers are filled with the language of hate and denial that characterized Arab political discourse toward Israel during the outbreak of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
"Both parties are steering their discourse toward the center, which will be a good thing for Spain," said Emilio Lamo de Espinosa, a sociologist.
He asserts that what Americans should really fear is the far better organized, more powerful and effective propaganda machine of the right that postulates the presumption of liberal bias through research groups, religious organizations, ideological news organizations and conservative personalities that "skews the entire discourse toward the right".
A Code Word for Discourse Toward the end of the 20th century, deconstruction became a code word of intellectual discourse, much as existentialism and structuralism -- two other fashionable, slippery philosophies that also emerged from France after World War II -- had been before it.
Not since the outbreak of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war have Arab newspapers been so filled with the language of hate and denial that once characterized Arab political discourse toward Israel under the Egyptian Gamel Abdel Nasser, the champion of Arab nationalism.
There is legitimate power wielded by Indigenous and Xicano leaders that helps empower discourses toward relevancy and honesty.
Egyptology has as its international spokesman someone for whom all discourse tends toward propaganda.
But as is so often the case with digital technology of all kinds — the tablet, the mp3, the Internet itself — the discourse tilts toward triumphalism.
New York Times columnist Tom Friedman recently expressed concern about the level of violent discourse aimed toward President Barack Obama.
At the same time, however, the style of deliberation also should transform the scientific discourse and lead the discussion toward classifying knowledge claims, characterizing uncertainties, exploring the range of alternative explanations, and acknowledging the limits of systematic knowledge in many risk arenas.
