Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(59)
It seems to me that given the sheer UGLY that is our general public discourse about pretty much anything these day, much less politics, it is incumbent upon us all (oh, can you imagine the blood lust of 2016??) to draw some clear lines about what's worthy of analysis and what's just beaten-to-death bullshit that's so predictable it's moldy.
That he did not speaks more to how marginalized views from the left of center that challenge currently popular assumptions about what counts as "real" educational reform have become in mainstream public discourse than to anything particularly novel that Ravitch now has to say.
One of my principles of 21st-century public discourse is that nobody ever admits that they were wrong about anything.
It is commonplace in American discourse that indebtedness has stripped the young of their poetical radicalism; they simply cannot afford to protest about anything, when the outcome could be a lifetime of college debt with no college degree.
One of my laws of political discourse — and, it turns out, of economic discourse, which turns out to be much the same thing — is that nobody ever admits having been wrong about anything.
About anything.
Can be about anything.
Nobody will say anything about anything.
Stories about anything, anything at all.
Was he right about anything?
It's not about anything".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com