Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Disclosure is defined literally as the action of making new or secret information known [ 4].
The second factor, "Readiness for Self- Disclosure", is defined as a participant's ability and readiness for talking about inner feelings, e.g. "I prefer to talk with my partner about facts rather than about feelings" or "It's fairly easy for me to tell my partner about myself: my feelings, wishes, and needs".
Similar(58)
The date of mutation status disclosure was defined as the time from which appropriate screening practices should have been followed.
Inappropriate HIV status disclosure was defined as disclosure of client's HIV status to the partner without client's consent after undergoing HCT, while sexual deprivation was defined as refusal of sex by the partner whenever the respondent wanted to have sex.
HIV disclosure however, is defined as a 'complex and multifaceted process of making a voluntary or involuntary decision about whom to inform about one's serostatus, why, when, where and how' [ 5].
According to the annex, the "level of impact" that ensues from the unauthorized disclosure of top secret material is defined as "exceptionally grave damage to national security".
In light of any type of cheating (however that is defined by the couple), there needs to be full disclosure.
The disclosure of secret material would lead to "serious damage", while the impact of classified material being leaked is defined as "damage".
As Bellman explains, a secret isn't invalidated by its disclosure; it's defined by its disclosure.
Disclosure status was defined by any indication from the caregiver or child that the child knew his/her HIV status, which was assessed by multiple questions about the child knowing the name of his/her illness and why s/he came to clinic or took medicines.
The determinants of partner disclosure to be tested were defined by the results of the analysis of the open-ended answers of 90 HIV-positive women and 67 HIV-positive men (see above section on qualitative analysis).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com