Still, there are many reasons to question whether he has talked with foreign officials with the proper disclosures, designed to ensure that those claiming to represent the interests of the United States aren't hiding their own interests or those of foreign governments.
"Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
Additionally, they wrote that "the disclosure or threat of disclosure is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause".
Additionally the disclosure, or threat of the disclosure, is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
Here is the government's exact words from a court filing they made in November 2013: Additionally the disclosure [of NSA/GCHQ documents], or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
As he puts it, "the current system of disclosure is designed to avoid liability, not to inform anybody".
Already, the stock is trading down on overseas markets, but the timing of the disclosure appears designed to minimize the impact of this news as much as possible.
Instead, the disclosure is designed to expose an attack that could be used this way and, apparently, to counter the claim by Apple that there is no way for it to read the messages.
Van Hollen is the chief sponsor of disclosure legislation designed to eliminate undisclosed "dark money" that has flowed into campaigns since the Supreme Court decision.
