Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Mr. Grant of Pax World Funds rejected the argument that disclosing proxy votes would be expensive.
The industry had vigorously opposed disclosing proxy votes, saying the practice would increase fund costs and make fund executives the targets of special interests.
"Disclosing proxy votes creates a lot of opportunity for mischief," he said, noting that fund companies can become targets for pressure groups.
While he would not confirm this, people in the industry say Fidelity is considering disclosing proxy votes before company meetings, putting its guidelines on its Web site and even creating a fund that would invest only in companies with superior governance.
3. Disclosing proxy votes will be costly.
2. Disclosing proxy votes will destroy confidential proxy voting.
Similar(53)
Under the new rule, mutual funds will be the only category of investors required to disclose proxy votes to the public, Mr. Fink said.
Belatedly, the SEC said last month it may require funds to disclose proxy votes.
Proof that individuals can make a difference is illustrated by the proposal the Securities and Exchange Commission passed in January 2003, which states that all mutual fund companies must disclose proxy voting policies and procedures and the actual votes to their shareholders.
Nevertheless, Stanford does not routinely disclose specific proxy votes as Harvard does.
That is when the commission plans to vote on a rule requiring mutual funds to disclose their proxy voting records.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com